Skip to main content

Wireless Conveniences… and Risks

Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
March 2007 Issue
February 11, 2007

Wireless Conveniences… and Risks

“Join open network Tom’s Place?”

The dialog box on my laptop’s screen was puzzling. Beyond the obvious problem that my name isn’t Tom, something unfamiliar and strange was happening. Why was my computer wanting to join Tom’s Place? Wasn’t my place good enough?

Welcome to the convenience of wireless networking.

I had turned on my laptop without first turning on my wireless router, so my laptop had automatically searched for any nearby wireless networks. The newest computer operating systems take it upon themselves to locate and join wireless networks, which is much better than the way things were only a few years ago. The downside of this automation had just revealed itself, though.

Because I don’t know “Tom” (not the real name, of course), but assumed he must be one of my neighbors, I told my laptop “No” and suddenly another dialog appeared. Did I want to join the network “Deadman’s Party” instead? No. Okay, maybe I wanted to join “Netgear020” the operating system suggested.

By the time I turned on my router and joined my own, “closed” network, I had located five wireless networks in my apartment complex.

I wonder if the owners of these networks realize the risks they are running? Maybe nothing at all will happen to their computers — or maybe someone will go “wardriving” for data.

As network speeds have increased, so have the ranges of the radio signals involved. My apartment is on a second floor, so even a weak signal might reach four or more residences. A strong wireless network might reach 300 yards or more. This is convenient if you want to work by your pool. It’s also convenient if someone wants to access a home computer from a car. That’s how wardriving works: a criminal drives through a neighborhood looking for wireless networks.

“Wardriving” and its variations (“warwalking” and “warspying”) are “geekspeak” for joining a wireless network for either curiosity’s sake or for malevolent purposes. Believe it or not, joining an open network is not illegal in most states, including California. The theory is that if you left your network open to any computer, you must have meant to do so. However, opening someone’s files without permission is illegal. It’s a small step from using an Internet connection for free to the crime of peaking at someone’s hard drive.

You might think our Valley isn’t home to cybercrime, but you’d be wrong.

I’ve had a customer call and ask why his printer was printing “interesting” images when he wasn’t home. Now, most wardrivers aren’t this daring, but someone was joining his home network and then printing inappropriate materials. This might seem funny, but what if this wardriver were to call the police and claim my client possessed illegal images?

The first step was to make sure the printer was not connected directly to a computer. Many home networks share a printer by connecting it to a computer. Sharing a printer in this manner can be risky, especially with older versions of Windows. If you want to share a printer, buy one that can connect directly to a network either via Ethernet or built-in wireless support.

In the case of my customer, the printer had its own network adapter. The next step was securing the customer’s wireless router.

Once the customer learned someone was using his network, he felt justifiably violated. Then the concern for the customer was no longer strange images printing. What if personal data were accessed remotely? How many of us have Quicken or Money files on our systems? Do you put passwords for Web sites in a file so you don’t forget them? Is there information on your system no one needs but you?

Sadly, a quick Web search on “wardriving” will reveal sites that distribute free tools for finding open wireless networks and also breaking into protected networks. With these tools, anyone can hijack your wireless network. However, most crooks are looking to work quickly, so a few precautions can save you a lot of misery.

Every wireless network should be password protected, using the best security available to the router. Early routers features “Wired Equivalent Privacy” (WEP) security, which requires a password before joining the network. Unfortunately, WEP is about as secure as a screen door. Newer routers use “Wi-Fi Protected Access version 2” (WPA2) for password protection. If your router allows you to select a form of security, do not use WEP.

The router I use allows me to specify which computers can join the network, as well as requiring those computers to have the right password. Also, the network is “invisible” to most computers. If terms like “WPA” and “MAC address” (which does not refer to an Apple computer) are scary, hire a local consultant to configure your router. This is a quick task, and worth the small fee.

Home networks aren’t the only wireless risks we face. Most of us with laptop computers go from network to network. I use at least three wireless networks on a regular basis, and even more when I travel. School networks tend to be open, which is great for surfing the Web and checking e-mail. Many coffee shops have free wireless, and I’ve located a restaurant with a public wireless network. While I can’t imagine sitting in a booth with my laptop during dinner, I’ve witnessed people unable to stop working while ordering their meal.

Public networks are convenient and risky. Sure, you can locate an iTunes music library on some stranger’s computer, but that also means people can locate files on your system.

Security really starts at the computer. You can turn-off features like “file sharing” in Windows or OS X. You can also password protect files in most popular applications. Of course, you should never keep usernames and passwords on your computer, either!

It would be nice to think that we’re somehow “safer” than residents of Silicon Valley when we go wireless. Stories on wardriving have appeared in major Bay Area newspapers, so people there might take more precautions. Still, the truth is, most of us setup our wireless networks with the “doors unlocked” not because we trust other people — we simply don’t understand how risky wireless computing can be.

Wireless networks are great. I’d never give up the freedom I enjoy using a wireless connection at home and work. I’m also as careful as I can be while still enjoying that freedom.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Writing Ideas

Online composition and participation are always a requirement in the courses I teach. When I began teaching at Fresno State as a graduate student in 2004, I was one of the few instructors who required students use Blackboard on a weekly basis. I believe there are several reasons to use tools like Blackboard / WebVista: Students can read and respond to the thoughts of their classmates. I have a record of how writing (and thinking) improve during a semester Peer editing can occur online, in small groups. Students less vocal in class discussions tend to participate more online. Normally, I post a " Weekly Response Question/Topic " based on class discussions during the week. Students can then extend the in-class discussion online. Those who were unable to speak up during the class have time to reflect and post their thoughts, too. By requiring every student to post at least 50 to 100 words a week, they soon engage each other in discussion. I always use threaded discussions...

Human Readers for Tests

As readers of my blogs know, I'm never opposed to using technology when it is an effective tool. I am opposed to the blind embrace of the latest trends without critical examination of the potential side effects. Computer-assisted grading, I can endorse to some extent because I use software to help me analyze student papers — and my own writings. But, I cannot and will not endorse any system that gives weight to the computer-based scoring. If you're a teacher, consider this petition: http://humanreaders.org/petition/index.php Now, I also want to add a critical comment on human graders. If the graders of standardized tests are using rigid scoring rubrics, they are little better than software algorithms. Bad grading is bad grading. Inflexible = bad. Again, I am not opposed to using a computer for fact checking, some plagiarism verification, and as formatting aids. Computers can and do help many of us write more effectively. But, I don't use computers to grade pape...

Podcasts and Internet Radio

You must read Podcasting News if you are interested in podcasts! The New York Times has NYTimes Podcasts covering almost every area of interest. For anyone and everyone, podcast.net is a directory of professional and amateur podcasts. Unfortunately, many podcasts come and go too quickly and the directory links to some ghost sites. For October 30, 2007, we were instructed: In your blog: listen to some podcasts and analyze different aspects of the production quality of these podcasts; then, reflect on ways that you could use writing to create podcasts or coursecasts; brainstorm some ideas for creating your own podcast: an interview, presentation... I am a fan of Internet Radio, podcasting, and pretty much all things resembling "radio" in any form. For November 6, we have been asked to create a podcast of some form, and I certainly don't see a problem creating a theatrical production of some sort. Podcasting has the convenience that most Web tools lack. A podcast ...