Skip to main content

ePubs and the Future

I have been working on various ebook projects and am frustrated by the amount of "hand coding" required to make an ePub book work well with several reader applications. When a book looks just right on one reader, it looks odd on another. Yet, we know the future is digital.

Most computer users are familiar with Adobe's ubiquitous Portable Document Format (PDF). The benefit of using PDF files is that a file includes all graphics, fonts, and layout information. A file appears nearly identical on every computer, tablet, handheld device, et cetera. A magazine in PDF looks like the designer intended — and design is the emphasis of the entire Adobe product line. Adobe's Creative Suite applications are for designers, not writers.

ePubs take a different approach, closer to the original intentions of HTML and similar document "markup" formats. Yes, you can put words in bold or change a few colors, but the intent of ePub is to allow the reader, the computer user, the ability to control specific font choices and even some layout choices. Content, not visuals, are the focus of ePub files, which are coded in a mix of HTML, CSS, XML, and plain text.

Both ePub and PDF have their roles in the digital age. ePubs let a reader easily change the appearance of a text to improve readability (the speed at which text is decoded), while PDF maintains original artistic intent. For example, most magazines are visual publications and the text is somewhat subordinate to visuals. A classic novel? The words matter. One way I consider which is the better format is by asking myself if a text would be appropriate in audio format. Audiobooks definitely don't emphasize visual design.

While I can create "perfect" PDF publications using almost any application on my computer, I can't seem to create an ePub that doesn't need some tuning. It is annoying and even absurd that software companies cannot accurately and completely generate a basic document format. Come on, software developers, HTML has existed since 1992 and SGML traces its history back to GML of the 1960s. You cannot create a good ePub editor based on more than 40 years of markup history?

There is no excuse for ePub generation to be so sloppy from most word processors, layout software, and XML editors. When a program gets the actual pages right, it doesn't include proper metadata. When the metadata are correct, the order of book elements is either incorrect or poorly maintained. I've tried InDesign, Pages, eCub, Sigil, and Oxygen. Each one is almost, but not quite, standards compliant.

We know that the ePub format, along with the .Mobi/PRC (Kindle) format, is where publishing is headed. Right now, ePubs are still in the early days, similar to the first years of HTML editors. That's a shame.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comic Sans Is (Generally) Lousy: Letters and Reading Challenges

Specimen of the typeface Comic Sans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Personally, I support everyone being able to type and read in whatever typefaces individuals prefer. If you like Comic Sans, then change the font while you type or read online content. If you like Helvetica, use that.

The digital world is not print. You can change typefaces. You can change their sizes. You can change colors. There is no reason to argue over what you use to type or to read as long as I can use typefaces that I like.

Now, as a design researcher? I'll tell you that type matters a lot to both the biological act of reading and the psychological act of constructing meaning. Statistically, there are "better" and "worse" type for conveying messages. There are also typefaces that are more legible and more readable. Sometimes, legibility does not help readability, either, as a type with overly distinct letters (legibility) can hinder word shapes and decoding (readability).

One of the co…

Let’s Make a Movie: Digital Filmmaking on a Budget

Film camera collection. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
June 5, 2015 Deadline
July 2015 Issue

Every weekend a small group of filmmakers I know make at least one three-minute movie and share the short film on their YouTube channel, 3X7 Films.

Inspired by the 48-Hour Film Project (48hourfilm.com), my colleagues started to joke about entering a 48-hour contest each month. Someone suggested that it might be possible to make a three-minute movie every week. Soon, 3X7 Films was launched as a Facebook group and members started to assemble teams to make movies.

The 48-Hour Film Project, also known as 48HFP, launched in 2001 by Mark Ruppert. He convinced some colleagues in Washington, D.C., that they could make a movie in 48 hours. The idea became a friendly competition. Fifteen years later, 48HFP is an international phenomenon, with competitions in cities around the world. Regional winners compete in national and international festivals.

On a Friday night, teams gathe…

Edutainment: Move Beyond Entertaining, to Learning

A drawing made in Tux Paint using various brushes and the Paint tool. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
November 2, 2015 Deadline
December 2015 Issue

Randomly clicking on letters, the young boy I was watching play an educational game “won” each level. He paid no attention to the letters themselves. His focus was on the dancing aliens at the end of each alphabet invasion.

Situations like this occur in classrooms and homes every day. Technology appeals to parents, politicians and some educators as a path towards more effective teaching. We often bring technology into our schools and homes, imagining the latest gadgets and software will magically transfer skills and information to our children.

This school year, I left teaching business communications to return to my doctoral specialty in education, technology and language development. As a board member of an autism-related charity, I speak to groups on how technology both helps and hinders special education. Busin…