Skip to main content

Dinosaur Me: An Attitude from the Past

The first developers of IBM PC computers negle...
The first developers of IBM PC computers neglected audio capabilities (first IBM model, 1981). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
December 10, 2012 Deadline
January 2013 Issue

Dinosaur Me: An Attitude from the Past

“Dude, you’re like a dinosaur of the PC era. PCs aren’t cool. We only use them to create phone apps.”

My students declared me a dinosaur after I suggested they should experiment with more software and programming tools on their personal computers.

What about playing games on PCs? When I was in college, serious gamers assembled impressive PC systems.

“Consoles are better. Who wants to mess with computer hardware?”

I asked about the Web.

“Dedicated apps on smartphones are better. Use the Facebook or Twitter app on your phone, not some cluttered Web page. Dude, seriously, you’re a PC dino.”

When a student calls you a dinosaur, even in jest, it seems like a good moment for reflection. As the classroom emptied into the foggy night, I closed the lid of my MacBook Pro and asked myself if he was right. Am I a dinosaur or do I have the wisdom of age?

Personal computers are in decline. Sales of computers have stagnated, and in late 2012 Windows-based PC sales dropped 21 percent according to the NPD Group. People are using phones, tablets, game consoles, and televisions to access the Internet. About half my students take notes on iPads, not laptop computers. They laugh because I own a “huge” laptop instead of a netbook or tablet.

Few of my students are interested in assembling a high-end desktop computer from components. They aren’t interested in computer languages or operating systems in the way I was, either. My students are technology users, and many plan technology careers, but the nature of being a “techie” has evolved.

One student’s project this semester explored “tech specs” in hardware advertising. The computer features promoted aren’t memory, storage capacity or processor speed. People want built-in Web cameras with lots of megapixels and high-resolution screens for movies.

I used to flip through the pages of Computer Shopper and PC Magazine every month. I paused at every ad, wondering which motherboard had the latest expansion options. Was AMD or Intel shipping the fastest processor this month? Which video card was fastest? The magazines were hundreds of pages thick, with ads for hardware and the latest programming tools. The 1980s and 90s now seem to be the Golden Age for computer hobbyists.

In that Golden Age of yesteryear, hobbyists debated which programming tools and frameworks were the best for developing software. First, you decided which language to support. Did you want to code in BASIC, Pascal, or C? Then you had to choose a compiler. Borland’s Turbo family of compilers had their loyal fans, including me, while other programmers used Microsoft’s Quick compilers, which seemed to always lag behind the latest Borland features.

Today, if you develop code for a Windows platform, the best choice is probably Microsoft’s C# language. Apple developers have one choice, the Objective-C language and Cocoa frameworks. Android programmers use C++ and frameworks developed by Google. The “closed” worlds of Apple and Microsoft have eliminated choices. Developer debates are pointless, since you can’t choose another set of tools. You use what the big companies have decided you’ll use.

In the 1990s, if you were interested in business applications, you debated FoxPro versus dBase, or any of a dozen other platforms for database development. I experimented with Paradox, Clipper, SuperBASE, Reflex, and Clarion database systems. I don’t know anybody using a dedicated database development tool anymore. My last use of Microsoft Access was six years ago.

Web developers tend to use MySQL as a database server, not because it is great technically, but because it is easy to install and configure. Though I recommend PostgreSQL for business and Web applications, my students remind me that job postings ask for MySQL experience. Tech specs and features don’t matter.

Web developers argue about which language is worse, Python or PHP, but they don’t seem to be passionate advocates for one or the other. The debates center on why one language is less annoying than the other, and which has the least readable syntax. While there are other scripting languages available, too much code is already in use on servers for Web developers to embrace dramatic changes. Programmers accept mediocre tools. Sometimes an alternative finds a niche, but not often.

Admittedly, few clients care about the tools software developers use, as long as a program works. Still, I am surprised that my technical students are ambivalent about programming tools and hardware.

Don’t misunderstand; there are still heated debates between self-proclaimed geeks and nerds, including what those two labels mean. But my students cannot imagine the diversity of the early PC years. The debates today seem different, more about style than substance.

“Mac versus PC” is seldom about the genuine and complex technical differences between operating systems: it is a style debate.

Most people are not programmers, but “power users” once demanded choices, too. I miss having some basic choices when considering the software for my daily work. While choices still exist, they aren’t practical for a variety of reasons. Earlier in my course, I had mentioned that I have tried various word processors, but inevitably return to Microsoft Word, which I don’t like.

“Why would you want a choice?” a student asked. “Isn’t it better that we all use the same word processor?”

Whether you use an Apple MacBook Pro or the latest Dell Latitude laptop, the odds are that you use Microsoft Word to prepare letters and reports. I explained to my students that I used WordPerfect, WordStar, Ami Pro, and XyWrite over the years. Today, I use Word because that’s what my colleagues and clients use. I show my students some alternatives, but the university document templates include features that do not work with other word processors.

In a technical writing course, I show my students an advertisement for Borland’s Quattro Pro spreadsheet. The ad lists the features of Quattro Pro, Lotus 1-2-3, and Microsoft Excel. My students don’t understand that software was advertised in business magazines. There was competition among software publishers.

“Professor Wyatt, you don’t get it. Who wants to shop for a spreadsheet?”

Maybe I am a dinosaur.


Popular posts from this blog

Slowly Rebooting in 286 Mode

The lumbar radiculopathy, which sounds too much like "ridiculously" for me, hasn't faded completely. My left leg still cramps, tingles, and hurts with sharp pains. My mind remains cloudy, too, even as I stop taking painkillers for the back pain and a recent surgery.

Efforts to reboot and get back on track intellectually, physically, and emotionally are off to a slow, grinding start. It reminds me of an old 80286 PC, the infamously confused Intel CPU that wasn't sure what it was meant to be. And this was before the "SX" fiascos, which wedded 32-bit CPU cores with 16-bit connections. The 80286 was supposed to be able to multitask, but design flaws resulted in a first-generation that was useless to operating system vendors.

My back, my knees, my ankles are each making noises like those old computers.

If I haven't already lost you as a reader, the basic problem is that my mind cannot focus on one task for long without exhaustion and multitasking seems…

MarsEdit and Blogging

MarsEdit (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Mailing posts to blogs, a practice I adopted in 2005, allows a blogger like me to store copies of draft posts within email. If Blogger, WordPress, or the blogging platform of the moment crashes or for some other reason eats my posts, at least I have the original drafts of most entries. I find having such a nicely organized archive convenient — much easier than remembering to archive posts from Blogger or WordPress to my computer.

With this post, I am testing MarsEdit from Red Sweater Software based on recent reviews, including an overview on 9to5Mac.

Composing posts an email offers a fast way to prepare draft blogs, but the email does not always work well if you want to include basic formatting, images, and links to online resources. Submitting to Blogger via Apple Mail often produced complex HTML with unnecessary font and paragraph formatting styles. Problems with rich text led me to convert blog entries to plaintext in Apple Mail and then format th…

Let’s Make a Movie: Digital Filmmaking on a Budget

Film camera collection. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
June 5, 2015 Deadline
July 2015 Issue

Every weekend a small group of filmmakers I know make at least one three-minute movie and share the short film on their YouTube channel, 3X7 Films.

Inspired by the 48-Hour Film Project (, my colleagues started to joke about entering a 48-hour contest each month. Someone suggested that it might be possible to make a three-minute movie every week. Soon, 3X7 Films was launched as a Facebook group and members started to assemble teams to make movies.

The 48-Hour Film Project, also known as 48HFP, launched in 2001 by Mark Ruppert. He convinced some colleagues in Washington, D.C., that they could make a movie in 48 hours. The idea became a friendly competition. Fifteen years later, 48HFP is an international phenomenon, with competitions in cities around the world. Regional winners compete in national and international festivals.

On a Friday night, teams gathe…