Skip to main content

Fonts and More Fonts

This is a portion of my summer (re)reading list, at least on one particular subject matter. I am reading various books on type and design. So far, I have completed Dodd and Lupton. The Bringhurst and Parker texts are re-reads, which I will tackle later in the summer. The current book on my stand is the Stanley Morison Tally of Types.

I'm putting the bibliography up top, to stress the books a bit more than my own ramblings.
  1. Bringhurst, Robert. The Elements of Typographic Style. 3rd ed ed. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks, Publishers, 2004.
  2. Consuegra, David. American Type: Design & Designers. New York: Allworth Press, 2004.
  3. Dodd, Robin. From Gutenberg to Open Type: An Illustrated History of Type From the Earliest Letterforms to the Latest Digital Fonts. Vancouver, WA: Hartley & Marks Publishers, 2006.
  4. Lupton, Ellen. Thinking With Type: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students. Vol. Design briefs. 1st ed ed. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2004.
  5. Made With Fontfont: Type for Independent Minds. 1st ed. Ed. Jan Middendorp, and Erik Spiekermann. New York: Mark Batty Publisher, 2007.
  6. Morison, Stanley, and Brooke Crutchley. A Tally of Types: With Additions By Several Hands; and With a New Introduction By Mike Parker. Boston: D.R. Godine, 1999.
  7. Parker, Roger C. Looking Good in Print. 3rd ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Ventana, 1993.
  8. Tice, Bruce, and Nadine Monem. Font. The Sourcebook. Black Dog Publishing, 2008.
Now then, for my own ramblings.

We have tried, especially in academia and in some forms of publishing, to downplay the power of the typeface, the font, and how a typeface influences the reading experience. We've adopted a utilitarian philosophy: the type should not get in the way of the words. The words are "special" and are somehow independent from presentation.

I've been experimenting with poetry and fonts. Poetry and prose were illuminated for a long time. Words on the page were accompanied by carefully designed miniatures. Borders and uncial scripts gave a text majestic form. Mechanized type meant less "frills" and a much colder rendering of texts.

There was a movement in the mid twentieth century to use type to affect the reader, with poetry set in shapes. Fonts were used by some to convey meaning. And then, poetry retreated back to under the heavy hand of bland typography.

I have been thinking about books and type a lot lately. I want to experiment more with fonts and emotion. I want to manipulate my readers. I want to play against their expectations, and then swerve into something at full-speed to leave the reader stunned and shaken.

We have all this wonderful technology, thanks to digital typography and illustration software. We should be using it to move beyond words alone. Lines of text to do need to be straight lines. We can twist and turn letters. We can add effects easily. But, we continue to think of that as somehow "wrong" -- a violation of the word.

The socialist and communist designers tried to devise "systems" that would guide readers to think logically, rationally. The type and the other design elements were to be subservient to the ideas and "science" of Marxism. The results were still emotional, and still rhetorical: Bolshevik posters are powerful in their attempts to focus on words and "realistic" images.

You can't create a page without the design giving some clue as to your philosophy or biases. Most novels suggest the words matter and are sufficient. But, imagine if you used a "Blackletter" font when setting the name of a village or household. That would be pretty powerful. I thought about using a "technology" font, such as OCR-B with its rigid shapes, when narrating from the perspective of a character. What would that convey about the character? Why not use such devices?

We should experiment. We should shatter the norms. Not only because we can, but because doing so might lead to something more. I do not know what more, but I wonder how readers might react.

My dissertation will appear in a bland 12-point Courier or similar font. The words will be what matters. Every dissertation the same, to focus on the words. I suppose only design students or other art majors get to say more than mere words.

I want more from my words. I want them to be more than a text. Something to ponder. It is also something to explore with our writing students.

Let's move beyond the "basic" fonts and see what happens. We might learn something about composition and rhetoric in this digital age. Advertising uses fonts well, so why not creative writing or even academic writing? Let's explore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What I Studied in Graduate School

Lower case ‘a’ from Adobe Caslon Pro, superposed onto some guides. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Asked to summarize my research projects...

Curiously, beyond the theses and dissertation, all my work is in economics of media and narrative. I ask what works and why when offering stories to audiences. What connects with an audience and can we model what audiences want from narratives? (Yes, you can model data on narratives and what "sells" and what wins awards and what nobody wants.)

Yet, my degree research projects all relate to design of writing spaces, as knowing what works is also key to knowing what could be "sold" to users.

MA: How poor LMS UI/UX design creates online spaces that hinder the writing process and teacher mentoring of students.

Also: The cost of LMS design and compliance with legal mandates for usability.

Ph.D: The experiences of special needs students in online settings, from commercial spaces to games to learning spaces and which spaces are best desig…

Comic Sans Is (Generally) Lousy: Letters and Reading Challenges

Specimen of the typeface Comic Sans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Personally, I support everyone being able to type and read in whatever typefaces individuals prefer. If you like Comic Sans, then change the font while you type or read online content. If you like Helvetica, use that.

The digital world is not print. You can change typefaces. You can change their sizes. You can change colors. There is no reason to argue over what you use to type or to read as long as I can use typefaces that I like.

Now, as a design researcher? I'll tell you that type matters a lot to both the biological act of reading and the psychological act of constructing meaning. Statistically, there are "better" and "worse" type for conveying messages. There are also typefaces that are more legible and more readable. Sometimes, legibility does not help readability, either, as a type with overly distinct letters (legibility) can hinder word shapes and decoding (readability).

One of the co…

MarsEdit and Blogging

MarsEdit (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Mailing posts to blogs, a practice I adopted in 2005, allows a blogger like me to store copies of draft posts within email. If Blogger, WordPress, or the blogging platform of the moment crashes or for some other reason eats my posts, at least I have the original drafts of most entries. I find having such a nicely organized archive convenient — much easier than remembering to archive posts from Blogger or WordPress to my computer.

With this post, I am testing MarsEdit from Red Sweater Software based on recent reviews, including an overview on 9to5Mac.

Composing posts an email offers a fast way to prepare draft blogs, but the email does not always work well if you want to include basic formatting, images, and links to online resources. Submitting to Blogger via Apple Mail often produced complex HTML with unnecessary font and paragraph formatting styles. Problems with rich text led me to convert blog entries to plaintext in Apple Mail and then format th…