Skip to main content

Will Textbooks Go Digital… and Free?

Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
March 2010 Issue
January 23, 2010

Will Textbooks Go Digital… and Free?

California schools spend nearly $500 million each year on textbooks, according to state reports. That is up $250 million over the last decade.

As any parent or teacher knows, a significant portion of this expense goes to replacing lost or damaged books. We also have a growing student population. In many schools, there aren’t enough books for complete class sets. Students end up sharing books or working in small groups.

Every few years, the California State Board of Education adopts new standards, known as frameworks, for our public schools (http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/). When standards undergo major revisions, textbooks need to be updated and replaced. The adoption of a new standard is a lengthy and expensive process, with textbook publishers eager to pitch their books to the state for approval. School districts must adopted texts that meet state criteria.

California, Texas, and Florida are huge markets for publishers. Only a handful of publishers can compete in these markets due to the incredible expense of revising texts to new standards.

The California Open Source Textbook Project, COSTP, is hoping to offer a free, or at least low-cost alternative to traditional textbook publishers. COSTP aims to create e-book versions of texts complying with California standards. The project Web site (http://www.opensourcetext.org/) explains that open source textbooks can and would still be printed by many districts, while they would also be available for e-book readers, such as the Kindle or Nook.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has championed e-books for schools, asking schools to consider adopting both commercial and open source digital texts by 2012. There are serious challenges to this ambitious plan, including textbook publishers increasing their political donations to state senate and assembly candidates.

One myth being reinforced by the publishing industry is that schools would need e-readers to adopt digital texts. Such devices would require faculty training. Also, if students lose and damage books, they will certainly lose and damage fragile electronic book readers.

The reality is that digital books can be printed on demand, as many digital textbooks are. In fact, I order a customized reader each year for the university courses I teach. The publisher assembles and prints the texts in a matter of days, including the classic short stories and poems I select.

These books are called “POD” (print on demand). I have the choice of ordering acid-free, long-life books that resemble other texts, or I can have books printed on uncoated paper with a “please recycle” logo on the back cover. I admit that most of my students would rather pay $20 for a recyclable book than $80 or more for the traditional edition.

Because standards are revised on a regular basis, why would any school order texts designed to last a century? I am not suggesting libraries buy POD editions, but science and history books are out-of-date in mere months.

My university students can also download electronic editions of the reader for free. Of course, they must own an e-reader or read on a computer screen, but some students do opt for the e-book edition of a text. Since an e-reader is $200, that means the student saves money after downloading a handful of digital texts. The book I use is distributed as an Adobe PDF, meaning it can be read on any computer and most e-readers.

I know three professors who offer their course texts to students in digital form for free. Most students still purchase a physical book, which remains more portable and requires to recharging. But, a handful of students do download the texts, saving a lot of money.

The Minnesota State Colleges use a free textbook for their academic writing courses, classes every student must complete. This book is posted on Wikibooks, where students can download the text as a PDF.

Several Ohio and Texas community colleges are also using the Web to distribute books for free. The College Open Textbook Collaborative and Flat World Knowledge are examples of online services dedicated to free texts. Flat World offers print editions, at a nominal fee.

Teams of teachers write most free textbooks. Why would a teacher do yet more work for free? Because good textbooks make teaching easier. When instructors like me work on a textbook, it is because we know what our students want and need. Publishers might meet standards, but they don’t know my students.

Ohio is starting with community college textbooks, but plans to adopt open source, teacher-created books at the secondary level over the next decade. The goal is to slowly introduce the technology as e-reader hardware becomes more affordable and familiar. Judging by my students, some actually prefer reading a screen to the printed page.

California should be a leader in the move to digital textbooks. How can the technology capital of the world be behind Ohio in digital textbook adoption?

If teachers knew about open source books and were encouraged to use them, I believe California instructors would soon contribute to dozens of book projects. If administrators offered small grants to teachers adopting open source books, grants based on the money saved, teachers would give digital textbooks serious consideration.

I doubt we could cut textbook budgets by more than a third by adopting digital books and POD editions, but that would still represent more than $150 million that could be spent on teachers, support staff, facilities and classroom supplies.

Maybe it won’t happen by 2012, but the digital textbook revolution is coming. It would be nice if our valley were at the forefront of this revolution.


Web Sites with Free Textbooks

http://en.wikibooks.org/
http://collegeopentextbooks.org/
http://www.gutenberg.org/
http://www.scribd.com/
http://www.flatworldknowledge.com/



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comic Sans Is (Generally) Lousy: Letters and Reading Challenges

Specimen of the typeface Comic Sans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Personally, I support everyone being able to type and read in whatever typefaces individuals prefer. If you like Comic Sans, then change the font while you type or read online content. If you like Helvetica, use that.

The digital world is not print. You can change typefaces. You can change their sizes. You can change colors. There is no reason to argue over what you use to type or to read as long as I can use typefaces that I like.

Now, as a design researcher? I'll tell you that type matters a lot to both the biological act of reading and the psychological act of constructing meaning. Statistically, there are "better" and "worse" type for conveying messages. There are also typefaces that are more legible and more readable. Sometimes, legibility does not help readability, either, as a type with overly distinct letters (legibility) can hinder word shapes and decoding (readability).

One of the co…

Let’s Make a Movie: Digital Filmmaking on a Budget

Film camera collection. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
June 5, 2015 Deadline
July 2015 Issue

Every weekend a small group of filmmakers I know make at least one three-minute movie and share the short film on their YouTube channel, 3X7 Films.

Inspired by the 48-Hour Film Project (48hourfilm.com), my colleagues started to joke about entering a 48-hour contest each month. Someone suggested that it might be possible to make a three-minute movie every week. Soon, 3X7 Films was launched as a Facebook group and members started to assemble teams to make movies.

The 48-Hour Film Project, also known as 48HFP, launched in 2001 by Mark Ruppert. He convinced some colleagues in Washington, D.C., that they could make a movie in 48 hours. The idea became a friendly competition. Fifteen years later, 48HFP is an international phenomenon, with competitions in cities around the world. Regional winners compete in national and international festivals.

On a Friday night, teams gathe…

What I Studied in Graduate School

Lower case ‘a’ from Adobe Caslon Pro, superposed onto some guides. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Asked to summarize my research projects...

Curiously, beyond the theses and dissertation, all my work is in economics of media and narrative. I ask what works and why when offering stories to audiences. What connects with an audience and can we model what audiences want from narratives? (Yes, you can model data on narratives and what "sells" and what wins awards and what nobody wants.)

Yet, my degree research projects all relate to design of writing spaces, as knowing what works is also key to knowing what could be "sold" to users.

MA: How poor LMS UI/UX design creates online spaces that hinder the writing process and teacher mentoring of students.

Also: The cost of LMS design and compliance with legal mandates for usability.

Ph.D: The experiences of special needs students in online settings, from commercial spaces to games to learning spaces and which spaces are best desig…