Skip to main content

Online Teaching vs Classrooms

As the second week of courses ends at my university, and I have prepared for the third, I finally have a bit of time for reflection.

First, let me state that the department in which I work is dedicated to delivering an online degree program that is equal in value and student experience to the on-campus degree. This task is not easy, since online courses by nature are different. From the delivery method itself to the nature of assessing students online, there are differences we cannot ignore, so we must adjust to ameliorate those imbalances.

Unfortunately, the university is running an ad campaign in local media that suggests online degrees are "convenient" for students. Nothing could be more misleading, in my opinion, than suggesting that an online degree is somehow more convenient or in any way "easy" compared to traditional studies. Online education requires more time, not less, and requires more self-discipline of students. The accelerated pace and the lack of classroom discussions also increase the probability that students will miss concepts or important information.

Online education is more work for educators and students. Don't let anyone try to say otherwise, I've repeatedly written here and elsewhere.

Online courses, in my opinion, should have at least a third fewer students than traditional courses. There should also be an opportunity for "live" text or video chats to help students bridge the traditional and online experiences.

The online program at our university is conducted in eight-week cycles. I dislike this intensely, pedagogically and logistically. There are a number of reasons for this:

1) When each week is two, students seldom read texts "deeply" and respond accordingly.

2) The "quick start" often leads online courses to be "behind" by two weeks, causing some assignments to be omitted.

3) Missing two online sessions is equal to missing four regular class sessions, a gap that cannot be bridged.

Moving so quickly risks a superficial course that doesn't leave a lasting impression on students. In the short-term, we might claim outcomes are equal, but what of long-term retention? What about the "convenience" when a working student misses a week online? That's far different from missing a single class meeting in a traditional course, especially if the traditional course meets more than once weekly.

I'm highly skeptical of claims that online and on-campus courses lead to "equal outcomes." How are we judging those outcomes? Grades? We know grades don't measure learning. Test results? Do those scores reflect long-term retention?

Online education is important and necessary for many students, especially non-traditional students. But, we have to ask ourselves some difficult questions. How can we ensure that online is as demanding — and rewarding — as the traditional experience? I'm not sure there are easy answers. And, I believe too much of the research is superficial, as if that research has sought to support online education, instead of challenging its value.

Many of us believe in online education; our research might reflect and support that bias.

I read recently that the public is more skeptical, overall, of online courses and degrees than are college administrators. Maybe the public perceptions should guide us? If our graduates' coworkers and employers question online education, we have to prove that it is equal to traditional learning. Sadly, too many online programs have hurt perceptions of online courses.

More thoughts in a day or two. I plan to discuss my own efforts to align a course that is both online and on-campus.


Popular posts from this blog

Comic Sans Is (Generally) Lousy: Letters and Reading Challenges

Specimen of the typeface Comic Sans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Personally, I support everyone being able to type and read in whatever typefaces individuals prefer. If you like Comic Sans, then change the font while you type or read online content. If you like Helvetica, use that.

The digital world is not print. You can change typefaces. You can change their sizes. You can change colors. There is no reason to argue over what you use to type or to read as long as I can use typefaces that I like.

Now, as a design researcher? I'll tell you that type matters a lot to both the biological act of reading and the psychological act of constructing meaning. Statistically, there are "better" and "worse" type for conveying messages. There are also typefaces that are more legible and more readable. Sometimes, legibility does not help readability, either, as a type with overly distinct letters (legibility) can hinder word shapes and decoding (readability).

One of the co…

Let’s Make a Movie: Digital Filmmaking on a Budget

Film camera collection. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
June 5, 2015 Deadline
July 2015 Issue

Every weekend a small group of filmmakers I know make at least one three-minute movie and share the short film on their YouTube channel, 3X7 Films.

Inspired by the 48-Hour Film Project (, my colleagues started to joke about entering a 48-hour contest each month. Someone suggested that it might be possible to make a three-minute movie every week. Soon, 3X7 Films was launched as a Facebook group and members started to assemble teams to make movies.

The 48-Hour Film Project, also known as 48HFP, launched in 2001 by Mark Ruppert. He convinced some colleagues in Washington, D.C., that they could make a movie in 48 hours. The idea became a friendly competition. Fifteen years later, 48HFP is an international phenomenon, with competitions in cities around the world. Regional winners compete in national and international festivals.

On a Friday night, teams gathe…

Edutainment: Move Beyond Entertaining, to Learning

A drawing made in Tux Paint using various brushes and the Paint tool. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Visalia Direct: Virtual Valley
November 2, 2015 Deadline
December 2015 Issue

Randomly clicking on letters, the young boy I was watching play an educational game “won” each level. He paid no attention to the letters themselves. His focus was on the dancing aliens at the end of each alphabet invasion.

Situations like this occur in classrooms and homes every day. Technology appeals to parents, politicians and some educators as a path towards more effective teaching. We often bring technology into our schools and homes, imagining the latest gadgets and software will magically transfer skills and information to our children.

This school year, I left teaching business communications to return to my doctoral specialty in education, technology and language development. As a board member of an autism-related charity, I speak to groups on how technology both helps and hinders special education. Busin…