Skip to main content

Social Networks and Students

University instructors have it somewhat easier than K12 teachers: accepting "friend" requests from our students, especially our adult and non-traditional students, isn't much of an ethical quagmire. Still, you have to be careful and have some guidelines or you'll risk trouble.

1) I only accept "friend" requests from former students who are 21 or older, so nobody can claim I have favorites or suggest anything untoward. Connecting to young students is, in my opinion, always a bad idea — especially for male teachers, but we've seen female teachers have "problems" online, too.

I explain to students that it isn't that I don't like them or want to be friends later in life, but it is important to maintain professional standing while they are in my courses.

2) LinkedIn is the "safest" social network for teachers to remain connected to former students. It is a professional, career-oriented network that is more about employment than sharing beach photos.

3) You can't stop students from "following you" on some networks, but you don't need (and usually shouldn't) follow current students in return. Twitter and Google+ feature "follow" options and Facebook has a "subscribe" feature. I know students follow my writing Twitter account, and I keep those postings professional and focused on writing.

4) Parents might want to "friend" or "follow" — and that's more complicated. Some parents are also educators or writers. If someone is a colleague or friend, I'm not going to "unfriend" him or her simply because a child is in my course. We have to be realistic, especially in smaller communities. Your social life and professional life will overlap, especially among parents.

5) Be careful to adjust privacy settings! Students can and will search for you online out of curiosity. You don't need students, parents, administrators, or some colleagues seeing the pictures of your wild vacations in Mexico. I set most posts on Facebook to "friends only" and post relatively impersonal things to Twitter or LinkedIn.

6) You cannot control what friends (or former friends) post online. Remember that anything you email  or share with friends might end up online. In fact, the more embarrassing or personal something is, the more likely friends will feel compelled to share it.

The best advice I can offer: imagine the worst consequences when you "connect" online or "share" posts publicly. I know that some blog posts might offend colleagues, but I try to keep as professional a tone as possible. Sometimes, obviously, I do post personal opinions and my theories on a number of topics, but I try to maintain a certain level of decorum.

I do email and message friends. I'm sure some of what I have shared online in private would be embarrassing in public. That's why you should always consider the "friends" you have online carefully. Nobody has 1000 true friends, and it isn't a contest to collect the most followers — especially among your students.

If you write a great blog on screenwriting, then you might have thousands of followers, including your students. That's acceptable. Having 1000 "close friends" on Facebook is probably unacceptable.

Think ahead. Especially online.
Enhanced by Zemanta


Popular posts from this blog

Comic Sans Is (Generally) Lousy: Letters and Reading Challenges

Specimen of the typeface Comic Sans. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Personally, I support everyone being able to type and read in whatever typefaces individuals prefer. If you like Comic Sans, then change the font while you type or read online content. If you like Helvetica, use that.

The digital world is not print. You can change typefaces. You can change their sizes. You can change colors. There is no reason to argue over what you use to type or to read as long as I can use typefaces that I like.

Now, as a design researcher? I'll tell you that type matters a lot to both the biological act of reading and the psychological act of constructing meaning. Statistically, there are "better" and "worse" type for conveying messages. There are also typefaces that are more legible and more readable. Sometimes, legibility does not help readability, either, as a type with overly distinct letters (legibility) can hinder word shapes and decoding (readability).

One of the co…

What I Studied in Graduate School

Lower case ‘a’ from Adobe Caslon Pro, superposed onto some guides. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Asked to summarize my research projects...

Curiously, beyond the theses and dissertation, all my work is in economics of media and narrative. I ask what works and why when offering stories to audiences. What connects with an audience and can we model what audiences want from narratives? (Yes, you can model data on narratives and what "sells" and what wins awards and what nobody wants.)

Yet, my degree research projects all relate to design of writing spaces, as knowing what works is also key to knowing what could be "sold" to users.

MA: How poor LMS UI/UX design creates online spaces that hinder the writing process and teacher mentoring of students.

Also: The cost of LMS design and compliance with legal mandates for usability.

Ph.D: The experiences of special needs students in online settings, from commercial spaces to games to learning spaces and which spaces are best desig…

Call for Papers: Rhetoric of Typography and Letterforms

Call for proposals for an edited collection:
Type Matters: the Rhetoricity of Letterforms
Edited by C.S. Wyatt and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss

Stephen Bernhardt warned us almost 30 years ago that our "preoccupation with conventional essay format" excludes the rhetorical rigor of typographic elements. Later, John Trimbur extended this argument, noting that "one of the main obstacles to seeing the materiality of writing has been the essayist tradition and its notion of a transparent text." Many visual rhetoric scholars have interrogated the ways in which meaning-making happens iconographically, photographically, and via other visual means. Few, however (save for Anne Frances Wysocki), have paid much attention to the rhetorical work that typography does.

Although always part of any text's argument, the choice of typeface is an under-articulated and under-studied aspect of textual production within composition and rhetoric. Today, even as there are thousands of font …