Skip to main content

Scripting Better Writing

Most writers develop patterns in their prose. Experts can use these patterns to calculate the likelihood that a given text was written by a particular author. For example, my weaknesses include "unfortunately" and "just." President Obama overuses the phrase, "Let me be clear." Does the president need our permission to be clear? I doubt anyone tries to obstruct presidential clarity.

Since buying my first copy of WordPerfect for DOS, I've maintained macros to help locate and remove my personal textual demons. The idea is simple: automatically highlight the words and phrases I might want to revise before submitting the text to an editor. Four years ago, a student noticed the red words in an open Word document on my laptop. She asked if the highlighting was part of Word's grammar or spellcheck features. I explained to her that when I finish writing a document I run several macros to mark potential problems.

When the student asked for a copy of the macro, I was confronted with what I call the "spellcheck" question: Does automatic "editing" help students?

There is a pedagogical concern when automating tasks associated with editing and revising. Teachers ask me if the automation leads to "laziness" among writers. I do not believe so. Using automation to highlight my weaknesses has helped me avoid the words and phrases during the writing process. In many ways, the word processor is acting as a coach. The macro I use does not change my words, nor does it suggest changes. Instead, I must decide if the highlighted words should be changed or removed. Sometimes, I leave the original words.

My students have found that customizing the macro for their individual writing patterns helps them discover patterns they didn't suspect existed. There are ways to generate "word frequency" tables, showing students which words they use most in a text. The frequency charts reveal "lots" of "really" abused words. Students are fascinated by this. The idea that a writer has a unique "voice" magically registers with students at that moment.

I am not opposed to automating editing tasks. No statistics instructor I know would oppose using Microsoft Excel macros. Creating the macros requires understanding the underlying concepts. A student has to understand what an adverb is and does before appreciating why some adverbs are "weak" word choices.

Below you will find the AppleScript I use when writing. When Microsoft shipped Office 2008 for the Mac, I had to convert my simple Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macro to AppleScript. This conversion was also an opportunity to add functionality to the macro. I've been asked to cut word counts, reduce complexity, and target a broader audience. I added Word functions that help me meet the requirements of my editors.
Note: The AppleScript Editor has moved several times in OS X. In 10.6, the editor is located in the "Utilities" folder. You can use Spotlight to find the AppleScript Editor, if all else fails.
If you use MS Word for the Mac, the script I crafted can be copied and saved to the following folder:
~/Documents/Microsoft User Data/Word Script Menu Items/
-- Mark likely problems within a document
-- C. S. Wyatt 2010
--
-- List of Words to Mark as Potential Problems 
set markWords to {"about", "all", "almost", "a lot", "already", "always", "along with", "anxiously", ¬
"absolutely", "as well", "believe", "certainly", "clearly", ¬
"eagerly", "easy", "easily", "every", "feel", "felt", "few", "finally", "frequently", ¬
"good", "got", "intrigued", "intrigues", "just", ¬
"many", "merely", "must", "nearly", "need", "never", "nice", "not", "numerous", ¬
"only", "quick", "quickly", "so", "think", ¬
"utilize", "utilized", "utilizes", "very", ¬
"in the event", "in order to", "on the grounds that", "in case", "the public", ¬
"come to the conclusion"}
tell application "Microsoft Word"
-- Cycle through the markWords and Bold/Underline the words
repeat with theWord in markWords
set findRange to find object of text object of active document
tell findRange
set match whole word to true
set content of replacement of findRange to "{" & theWord & "}"
set bold of font object of replacement of findRange to true
set color index of font object of replacement of findRange to red
set underline of font object of replacement of findRange to underline thick
execute find find text theWord replace replace all
end tell
end repeat

-- Calculate stats
set statWordCount to compute statistics active document statistic statistic words
set statFKGradeLevel to get readability value of readability statistic 10 of text object of active document
set statParagraphs to get readability value of readability statistic 3 of text object of active document
set statSentences to get readability value of readability statistic 4 of text object of active document
set statSentPerParagraph to get readability value of readability statistic 5 of text object of active document
set statWordsPerSent to get readability value of readability statistic 6 of text object of active document
set statPassiveSents to get readability value of readability statistic 8 of text object of active document

-- Move to end of document
set currentDoc to text object of active document
insert break at currentDoc break type section break next page

-- Create a report on the document, after a page break
set currentDoc to collapse range currentDoc direction collapse end
insert paragraph at end of currentDoc
type text selection text "Report on Text"
type paragraph selection
type text selection text "Grade Level: " & statFKGradeLevel
type paragraph selection
type text selection text "Number of Paragraphs: " & statParagraphs & ¬
"; Sentences per Paragraph: " & statSentPerParagraph
type paragraph selection
type text selection text "Number of Sentences: " & statSentences & ¬
"; Words per Sentences: " & statWordsPerSent
type paragraph selection
type text selection text "Passive Sentences: " & statPassiveSents
type paragraph selection
type text selection text "Number of Words: " & statWordCount

end tell

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Writing Ideas

Online composition and participation are always a requirement in the courses I teach. When I began teaching at Fresno State as a graduate student in 2004, I was one of the few instructors who required students use Blackboard on a weekly basis. I believe there are several reasons to use tools like Blackboard / WebVista: Students can read and respond to the thoughts of their classmates. I have a record of how writing (and thinking) improve during a semester Peer editing can occur online, in small groups. Students less vocal in class discussions tend to participate more online. Normally, I post a " Weekly Response Question/Topic " based on class discussions during the week. Students can then extend the in-class discussion online. Those who were unable to speak up during the class have time to reflect and post their thoughts, too. By requiring every student to post at least 50 to 100 words a week, they soon engage each other in discussion. I always use threaded discussions...

Human Readers for Tests

As readers of my blogs know, I'm never opposed to using technology when it is an effective tool. I am opposed to the blind embrace of the latest trends without critical examination of the potential side effects. Computer-assisted grading, I can endorse to some extent because I use software to help me analyze student papers — and my own writings. But, I cannot and will not endorse any system that gives weight to the computer-based scoring. If you're a teacher, consider this petition: http://humanreaders.org/petition/index.php Now, I also want to add a critical comment on human graders. If the graders of standardized tests are using rigid scoring rubrics, they are little better than software algorithms. Bad grading is bad grading. Inflexible = bad. Again, I am not opposed to using a computer for fact checking, some plagiarism verification, and as formatting aids. Computers can and do help many of us write more effectively. But, I don't use computers to grade pape...

Podcasts and Internet Radio

You must read Podcasting News if you are interested in podcasts! The New York Times has NYTimes Podcasts covering almost every area of interest. For anyone and everyone, podcast.net is a directory of professional and amateur podcasts. Unfortunately, many podcasts come and go too quickly and the directory links to some ghost sites. For October 30, 2007, we were instructed: In your blog: listen to some podcasts and analyze different aspects of the production quality of these podcasts; then, reflect on ways that you could use writing to create podcasts or coursecasts; brainstorm some ideas for creating your own podcast: an interview, presentation... I am a fan of Internet Radio, podcasting, and pretty much all things resembling "radio" in any form. For November 6, we have been asked to create a podcast of some form, and I certainly don't see a problem creating a theatrical production of some sort. Podcasting has the convenience that most Web tools lack. A podcast ...